High Resolution 3D Epitope Mapping Services. Antibody-Antigen 3D Structure Determination.
SARomics Biostructures’ Contract Research Organization (CRO) team specializes in crystallization and structure determination of antibodies and antibody-antigen complexes, as well as high-resolution 3D mapping of epitopes and paratopes. Our services are enhanced by our FastLane list of extracellular proteins, which facilitates antibody-antigen complex crystallization, and by our proximity to the MAX IV synchrotron in Lund.


antibodies and antibody-antigen complex Structures & High-Resolution 3D Epitope Mapping
SARomics Biostructures offers crystallization and X-ray structure determination of antibodies and antibody-antigen complexes, as well as high-resolution 3D epitope and paratope mapping. Our FastLane list of extracellular proteins for antibody-antigen complex crystallization, combined with our proximity to the 4th generation MAX IV synchrotron in Lund, ensures rapid delivery of results to our clients.
We also offer higher-order structure (HOS) analysis of biosimilars using X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy. All our studies also include biophysical characterization of the proteins in solution. For details of our services, please see below:
Find your protein of interest in the tables below and contact us for a discussion of your project!
We have contributed to many projects by determining the three-dimensional structures of antibody-antigen complexes and epitope mapping. Our clients have published several disclosable structures in leading journals. Please see the list of case studies below. See also our blog post on 3D epitope mapping techniques and on the advantages of NMR spectroscopy in comparability analysis of biosimilars’ HOS.
SARomics Biostructures Antibody Structure Services
FastLane Proteins for Antibody-Antigen Complex Crystallization & 3D Epitope Mapping
Our lists of FastLane extracellular proteins prepared for co-crystallization with their specific antibodies further reduce time and costs for high-resolution 3D epitope mapping. These proteins have already been used in numerous projects to determine the structure of antibody-antigen complexes. The turnaround time for these complexes can be as short as just 3-4 weeks.
The text below explains the advantages of structural biology methods, such as cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography, for 3D epitope mapping.
Several animal experiments have demonstrated that platelet glycoprotein VI (GPVI) plays a crucial role in thrombosis associated with ischemic stroke. On this basis, GPVI is a potential target for developing new antiplatelet molecules with low bleeding risk. The crystal structure of Glenzocimab, a Fab fragment of humanized anti-GPVI monoclonal antibody, with the monomeric extracellular domain of Platelet glycoprotein VI GPVI, has been determined at 1.9 Å. The structure revealed the Glenzocimab epitope at the dimerization site in the D2 domain of GPVI, which the antibody binds to, inhibiting GPVI interaction with CRP, collagen, and fibrin by disrupting dimerization, inducing conformational changes, and imposing steric hindrance.
Why Choose X-ray Crystallography for High-Resolution 3D Epitope Mapping?
Epitope mapping is central to therapeutic monoclonal antibody (mAb) development, as it is essential for analyzing the antibody’s mode of action, including its interactions with the antigen. It has also been noted by Deng et al. (2017) that the quality, conformation, and resolution of epitope residue data can influence the breadth and strength of mAb patents and are essential for strengthening patent protection and overcoming potential challenges in patenting mAbs.
An important consideration is the type of epitope being studied. Epitopes are generally categorized into two main types: linear and conformational epitopes. Linear epitopes consist of short, continuous sequences of amino acids. In contrast, conformational epitopes are derived from the protein’s three-dimensional structure and do not have to form a continuous sequence within the antigen. Different epitope mapping techniques are used depending on the epitope type (Dang et al., 2023). Traditionally, epitopes are examined by hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) or chemical cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS). Several computational approaches for epitope prediction have also been developed.
While X-ray crystallography (and even cryo-EM) is regarded as the gold standard for high-resolution 3D epitope mapping, there are common misconceptions that the method is too expensive, too time-consuming, requires a large amount of material, or that crystals of mAbs in complex with the antigen are impossible to obtain. It is true that obtaining crystals of an antibody-antigen complex, or of any other protein or protein complex, can be challenging. However, new crystallization techniques that help address many of the method’s problems are continuously being developed. Additionally, crystallization generally does not take long, enabling quick analysis and assessment of the experimental results. Once crystals are obtained, collecting X-ray data and determining the structure are now more straightforward thanks to recent advancements in synchrotron technology (see our blog post on industrial synchrotron crystallography). Even cryo-EM has undergone a major technical overhaul, leading to breakthroughs in the resolution and speed of structure determination for samples that are challenging for X-ray crystallography.
The advances in cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography instrumentation have greatly reduced costs and accelerated the determination of high-resolution structures of proteins and protein-ligand complexes. This is demonstrated by the growth of the Structural Antibody Database (SabDab), which houses over 10,000 antibody structures and 9936 tertiary structures of antibody-antigen complexes determined by X-ray crystallography and cryo-EM. Of these (March 2026), 6,570 structures were determined using X-ray crystallography, 3,945 using Cryo-Electron Microscopy, and 17 by NMR spectroscopy. Out of the X-ray crystallographic structures analyzed, 3,773 (57%) exhibited a resolution better than 3.0 Å, while 1,172 structures had a resolution exceeding 2.0 Å (18%). For cryo-EM structures, 1,475 had a resolution better than 3.0 Å (37%), and 397 structures achieved a resolution exceeding 2.0 Å (10%). The statistics clearly demonstrate the usefulness of these methods, which provide the most accurate, high-resolution insights into antibody-antigen interactions and detailed 3D epitope and paratope mapping. We should also note that these structures can reveal possible conformational changes and allosteric effects that occur during the formation of an antibody-antigen complex, which are very difficult to observe using traditional methods. Needless to say, all this information may significantly enhance antibody targeting.
For more details, please see our blog post on 3D epitope mapping techniques. See also the case studies described below, which include client projects with antibody-antigen complex structures determined at high resolution by the SARomics team using X-ray crystallography and published in high-impact journals. You may also visit our publications page, which showcases 8 Nature papers and over 10 additional publications in other high-impact journals.
Case Studies: Antibody-Antigen Complex Structures Contributed by SARomics Biostructures
SARomics Biostructures CRO team has contributed to the 3D structure determination of numerous antibody-antigen complexes. Several of these projects have been published in high-ranking journals, including PNAS, Nature Communications, Cell Reports, iScience, Cancer Therapy, Blood Advances, and Structure.
Some of the papers are listed below; more details on the publications can be viewed in the PDF on the right or downloaded here.
Structural analysis of light chain-driven bispecific antibodies targeting CD47 and PD-L1. Malinge (Light Chain Bioscience – Novimmune SA) et al., 2024, mAbs, 16, 2362432.
In this study, the authors developed a bispecific antibody format that, unlike natural antibodies, which primarily use the heavy chain to interact with their specific antigens, utilizes the light chain (LC) for antigen recognition and binding. To enhance understanding of epitope-paratope interactions, SARomics Biostructures assisted in the crystallization and structure determination of complexes formed between two antigen-binding Fab fragments and human CD47 and PD-L1 (see our FastLane™ Premium library). The analysis of these complex structures revealed that, while the light chains (LCs) play the dominant role in antigen binding, the heavy chain (HC) also engages in some interactions with both CD47 and PD-L1.
PDB ID: 8RP8 and 8RPB at a resolution of 2 Å and 2.79 Å, respectively.
Structure-guided engineering of immunotherapies targeting TRBC1 and TRBC2 in T cell malignancies. Ferrari (Autolus Therapeutics) et al., 2024, Nat Commun, 15.
Peripheral T cell lymphomas are typically aggressive with a poor prognosis. Unlike other hematologic malignancies, the lack of target antigens to discriminate healthy from malignant cells limits the efficacy of immunotherapeutic approaches. The T cell receptor expresses one of two highly homologous chains [T cell receptor β-chain constant (TRBC) domains 1 and 2] in a mutually exclusive manner, making it a promising target. Here, the authors demonstrate specificity redirection by rational design, using structure-guided computational biology to generate a TRBC2-specific antibody (KFN), complementing the previously described laboratory antibody with unique TRBC1 specificity (Jovi-1) to target a broader spectrum of T cell malignancies that clonally express either chain. SARomics Biostructures assisted the project by determining the 3D structure of Jovi-1 in complex with TRBC2. The structure of the antibody-antigen complex helped explain Jovi-1’s high selectivity for TRBC1.
PDB ID: 7AMP, 7AMQ, 7AMR, and 7AMS at a resolution of 2.64 Å, 2.35 Å, 1.95 Å, and 2.42 Å, respectively.